Who can catch a liar?

نویسندگان

  • P Ekman
  • M O'Sullivan
چکیده

The ability to detect lying was evaluated in 509 people including law-enforcement personnel, such as members of the U.S. Secret Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, National Security Agency, Drug Enforcement Agency, California police and judges, as well as psychiatrists, college students, and working adults. A videotape showed 10 people who were either lying or telling the truth in describing their feelings. Only the Secret Service performed better than chance, and they were significantly more accurate than all of the other groups. When occupational group was disregarded, it was found that those who were accurate apparently used different behavioral clues and had different skills than those who were inaccurate.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Undeniably Paradoxical: Reply to Jacquette

Can we solve the Liar paradox by simply declaring Liar sentences to be false? That is the proposal of Dale Jacquette in (Jacquette, 2007). The Liar paradox arises because apparently we can derive a contradiction from the assumption that the Liar sentence is true, and we can also derive a contradiction from the assumption that it is false. Jacquette argues that the former reasoning (i.e., the de...

متن کامل

Communication with Detectable Deceit

We analyze a model of communication with an extreme conflict of interest in which deceit is detectable with positive probability. The sender observes (possibly imprecise) information about his type, and can send any message to the receiver at no cost. If he lies---either by claiming more precise information or a false type---his message ends up incoherent with positive probability. In any infor...

متن کامل

The Liar and the Inconsistency of Language

A fairly common assumption about the Liar paradox is that it is a formal problem that can be safely delegated to mathematical logicians, and that its proper resolution can be trusted not to disrupt anyone else’s philosophical theories and projects. Serious students of the Liar know better. While purely formal approaches to the Liar abound, it is not a purely formal problem. Philosophical interp...

متن کامل

To catch a liar: The effects of truthful and deceptive testimony on inferential learning

Much of what people learn is based on the testimony of others, but not all testimony is helpful. This study explores how people deceive and how they deal with deceptive information in the context of a conceptual learning task. Participants play a game in which a learner infers the location of a rectangle based on the testimony of an informant, who is either helpful or deceptive. We investigate ...

متن کامل

The simple liar without bivalence?

1. Background The Simple Liar is a sentence that says of itself only that it is false. The Strengthened Liar is a sentence that says of itself only that it is not true. How does the Strengthened Liar differ from its (allegedly) weaker brother, namely, the Simple Liar? According to standard thinking the Simple Liar, unlike the Strengthened Liar, yields inconsistency only if the following princip...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • The American psychologist

دوره 46 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1991